Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 31
Filter
1.
J Craniofac Surg ; 34(3): 1089-1092, 2023 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2317907

ABSTRACT

Endonasal endoscopic approaches are the most preferred surgical methods in patients with pseudotumor cerebri because of easy access to the optic nerve, but the choice of this technique may not apply to all endoscopic endonasal cases. Moreover, there may be difficulties in practice in some cases, including the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. This study aimed to suggest an alternative endoscopic approach by lateral orbitotomy for optic nerve decompression in patients with pseudotumor cerebri. The study was performed using 5 fresh-frozen cadaver heads (bilaterally, total of 10 sides) injected intravenously with colored silicone preserved in the cold chain. An average of 2.5 cm skin incision was made to fit the lateral orbitotomy. The lengths of the recurrent meningeal artery (mm), the meningo-orbital band (mm), and the optic nerve (mm) to the orbital margin were measured. After these morphometric measurements, optic nerve decompression was performed endoscopically, and the length of the decompression was measured (mm). The average length (mm) between the orbital rim and meningeal recurrent artery (or meningolacrimal branch) was 16.2 mm, between the orbital rim and the meningo-orbital band was 18.5 mm, and between the orbital rim and optic nerve was 44.1 mm. The average optic nerve decompression length was 4.4 mm. The endoscopic lateral orbitotomy approach provides easy access to the optic nerve by anatomically following the recurrent meningeal artery and the meningo-orbital band. It can be a safe second-line approach after endonasal approaches for optic nerve decompression in pseudotumor cerebri.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pseudotumor Cerebri , Humans , Pseudotumor Cerebri/surgery , Endoscopy/methods , Optic Nerve/surgery , Decompression, Surgical/methods
2.
Otol Neurotol ; 43(8): e856-e860, 2022 09 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1992396

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Cerebrospinal fluid leak and pneumocephalus are rare but potentially devastating complications associated with translabyrinthine resection of cerebellopontine angle masses. Persistent pneumocephalus despite proximal eustachian tube (ET) obliteration is rare. We describe, to our knowledge, the first report of successful management of tension pneumocephalus by endoscopic endonasal ET obliteration using a novel V-loc (Covidien; Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) suture technique. PATIENTS: A 63-year-old man presented with altered mental status 10 months after translabyrinthine excision of a left cerebellopontine angle vestibular schwannoma measuring 2.8 × 2.9 × 3.3 cm. Computed tomography demonstrated diffuse ventriculomegaly and new pneumocephalus along the right frontal lobe, lateral ventricles, and third ventricle, and air within the left translabyrinthine resection cavity. INTERVENTION: The patient underwent left-sided endoscopic endonasal ET obliteration using 2-0, 9-inch V-loc suture. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Postoperatively, the patient's mental status improved with a decrease in size of the lateral and third ventricles on computed tomography. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic endonasal ET obliteration, a technique previously applied to recalcitrant cerebrospinal fluid leaks, is a safe and reasonable alternative to reentering the original surgical site for patients with pneumocephalus after lateral skull base surgery. Utilizing a V-loc suture for this technique instead of a traditional suture may improve procedural ease and speed.


Subject(s)
Eustachian Tube , Neuroma, Acoustic , Pneumocephalus , Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak/etiology , Endoscopy/methods , Eustachian Tube/surgery , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neuroma, Acoustic/complications , Neuroma, Acoustic/surgery , Pneumocephalus/diagnostic imaging , Pneumocephalus/etiology , Pneumocephalus/surgery , Postoperative Complications/etiology
4.
Cell ; 184(24): 5932-5949.e15, 2021 11 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1549679

ABSTRACT

Anosmia, the loss of smell, is a common and often the sole symptom of COVID-19. The onset of the sequence of pathobiological events leading to olfactory dysfunction remains obscure. Here, we have developed a postmortem bedside surgical procedure to harvest endoscopically samples of respiratory and olfactory mucosae and whole olfactory bulbs. Our cohort of 85 cases included COVID-19 patients who died a few days after infection with SARS-CoV-2, enabling us to catch the virus while it was still replicating. We found that sustentacular cells are the major target cell type in the olfactory mucosa. We failed to find evidence for infection of olfactory sensory neurons, and the parenchyma of the olfactory bulb is spared as well. Thus, SARS-CoV-2 does not appear to be a neurotropic virus. We postulate that transient insufficient support from sustentacular cells triggers transient olfactory dysfunction in COVID-19. Olfactory sensory neurons would become affected without getting infected.


Subject(s)
Autopsy/methods , COVID-19/mortality , COVID-19/virology , Olfactory Bulb/virology , Olfactory Mucosa/virology , Respiratory Mucosa/virology , Aged , Anosmia , COVID-19/physiopathology , Endoscopy/methods , Female , Glucuronosyltransferase/biosynthesis , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , In Situ Hybridization , Male , Microscopy, Fluorescence , Middle Aged , Olfaction Disorders , Olfactory Receptor Neurons/metabolism , Respiratory System , SARS-CoV-2 , Smell
6.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 167(3): 417-424, 2022 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1463137

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this systematic review is to assimilate the literature on objective assessment of particulate aerosolization during transnasal endoscopic procedures. DATA SOURCES: PubMed and hand-searched articles. REVIEW METHODS: The PubMed electronic database was searched using Medical Subject Headings and free-text search terms relating to aerosolization and transnasal endoscopic procedures from inception to November 16, 2020. References were hand-searched to identify additional publications for consideration. Inclusion in the systematic review required quantification of aerosol generation during clinic transnasal endoscopic procedures. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and flowchart were followed during the systematic review. RESULTS: Eight of 900 studies met criteria for inclusion in the systematic review. Five studies tested nasal endoscopy with mixed findings on the risk of aerosol generation during this procedure. Two studies assessed flexible fiberoptic laryngoscopy and also reported mixed findings. Breathing, sneezing, speech, and spray anesthetic/decongestants were found to consistently increase aerosol generation above baseline. A number of studies tested new and general mitigation strategies and were found to be effective in decreasing aerosol generation. CONCLUSIONS: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has informed many considerations regarding patient and provider safety. It is valuable to understand the risk during outpatient otolaryngology procedures through the quantification of aerosolization. There are several effective methods to control aerosolization during these procedures. The findings of this systematic review will inform appropriate precautions to protect against spread of infectious agents by aerosolization.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , COVID-19/epidemiology , Endoscopy/methods , Humans , Pandemics/prevention & control , Respiratory Aerosols and Droplets , SARS-CoV-2
7.
Indian J Gastroenterol ; 40(4): 410-419, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1338283

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: During Corona Virus Disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic, it has been estimated that approximately 10% of health care professionals (HCPs) have been diagnosed contacting  COVID-19. Aerosol-generating procedures have led to change in safety practices among HCPs. We thus evaluated the efficacy of the endoscopic safety measures among HCPs posted in the endoscopy unit. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, all endoscopic procedures performed over a period of 4 months, from 1 April to 31 July 2020 were included. We noted indications and number of COVID-positive procedures as well as comprehensive screening of HCPs posted in our endoscopy unit. The aim of the study was to evaluate the incidence and outcome of COVID-19 among HCPs. RESULTS: Three thousand four hundred and sixty procedures were included in the analysis. Indications were divided as urgent (n = 190, 5.49%), semi-urgent (n = 553, 16%) and non-urgent group (n = 2717, 78.52%). Thirty-four procedures (0.98%) were done on diagnosed COVID-19 patients. The most common indications were gastrointestinal bleed (n = 12/34, 35.30%) followed by biliary sepsis (n = 9/34, 26.5%). Among the HCPs, the incidence of symptomatic COVID-19 was 6.58% (n = 5/76). All HCPs recovered with excellent outcomes. A comprehensive screening showed 7.90% (n = 6/76) HCPs having Immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody in their sera. CONCLUSION: Addition of safety measures in endoscopy leads to low risk of transmission among HCPs.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Endoscopy/methods , Health Personnel , Infection Control/methods , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/prevention & control , Occupational Diseases/prevention & control , Occupational Health , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/transmission , Female , Humans , Incidence , India , Infection Control/instrumentation , Infection Control/standards , Male , Middle Aged , Occupational Diseases/diagnosis , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Health/standards , Personal Protective Equipment , Retrospective Studies , Tertiary Care Centers , Young Adult
8.
Neurocirugia (Astur : Engl Ed) ; 33(3): 130-134, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1284404

ABSTRACT

Current SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus pandemic is challenging medical and surgical activities. Specifically, within neurosurgery, endoscopic endonasal approaches pose a high risk of contagion for healthcare personnel involved in it. Initially, the recommendation was to avoid such surgeries. However, the pandemic has dragged on and new solutions must be proposed to continue carrying out these approaches safely. Given the lack of established protocols, we propose the following one, which concisely establishes the measures to be taken in both urgent and scheduled surgery. In addition, a new protection-aspiration device (Maskpirator) is described.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Endoscopy/methods , Humans , Pandemics/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Skull Base/surgery
9.
Arab J Gastroenterol ; 22(2): 170-173, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1258299

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The COVID-19 outbreak has reorganized surgical team conditions regarding endoscopy. The number of interventions has been reduced, the number of healthcare professionals must be limited, and both the patients and physicians are more protected than ever. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the highest peak of contagion in Colombia, endoscopy, colonoscopy, and esophagogastroduodenoscopy were performed using a low-cost disposable device. A total of 1388 procedures were performed. Every patient was assessed for symptoms via a telephone call, at the health center, and after the procedure, following specific attention routes. RESULTS: After procedure follow-up, no positive cases of COVID-19 were noted. CONCLUSION: The methodology reduced the risk of infection during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Endoscopy , Telemedicine , COVID-19/prevention & control , Colombia , Disposable Equipment , Endoscopy/instrumentation , Endoscopy/methods , Humans , Pandemics
10.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol ; 130(11): 1245-1253, 2021 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1140414

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Define aerosol and droplet risks associated with routine otolaryngology clinic procedures during the COVID-19 era. METHODS: Clinical procedures were simulated in cadaveric heads whose oral and nasal cavities were coated with fluorescent tracer (vitamin B2) and breathing was manually simulated through retrograde intubation. A cascade impactor placed adjacent to the nares collected generated particles with aerodynamic diameters ≤14.1 µm. The 3D printed models and syringes were used to simulate middle and external ear suctioning as well as open suctioning, respectively. Provider's personal protective equipment (PPE) and procedural field contamination were also recorded for all trials using vitamin B2 fluorescent tracer. RESULTS: The positive controls of nebulized vitamin B2 produced aerosol particles ≤3.30 µm and endonasal drilling of a 3D model generated particles ≤14.1 µm. As compared with positive controls, aerosols and small droplets with aerodynamic diameter ≤14.1 µm were not detected during rigid nasal endoscopy, flexible fiberoptic laryngoscopy, and rigid nasal suction of cadavers with simulated breathing. There was minimal to no field contamination in all 3 scenarios. Middle and external ear suctioning and open container suctioning did not result in any detectable droplet contamination. The clinic suction unit contained all fluorescent material without surrounding environmental contamination. CONCLUSION: While patients' coughing and sneezing may create a baseline risk for providers, this study demonstrates that nasal endoscopy, flexible laryngoscopy, and suctioning inherently do not pose an additional risk in terms of aerosol and small droplet generation. An overarching generalization cannot be made about endoscopy or suctioning being an aerosol generating procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.


Subject(s)
Aerosols/adverse effects , COVID-19 , Disease Transmission, Infectious/prevention & control , Endoscopy , Otolaryngology , Risk Adjustment/methods , Suction , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/transmission , Cadaver , Endoscopy/adverse effects , Endoscopy/instrumentation , Endoscopy/methods , Humans , Otolaryngology/methods , Otolaryngology/standards , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Personal Protective Equipment/classification , Personal Protective Equipment/virology , Research Design , Risk Assessment/methods , SARS-CoV-2 , Suction/adverse effects , Suction/instrumentation , Suction/methods
11.
Khirurgiia (Mosk) ; (12): 16-21, 2020.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-969483

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To summarize an experience of endoscopy-assisted dilatational tracheostomies in patients with COVID-19. MATERIAL AND METHODS: There were 31 endoscopy-assisted dilatational tracheostomies in patients with COVID-19 for the period from April 17 to June 10, 2020 (11 women and 19 men). Mean age of patients was 66.7 years (range 48-87). Tracheostomy was performed using Ciaglia (22) and Griggs (9) techniques. All procedures were carried out at the intensive care unit in elective fashion. RESULTS: Tracheostomy was performed in 19.8% of ICU patients or 36.9% of all patients on mechanical ventilation within 6.5±2.5 days [min 3, max 11]. There were 22 survivors with tracheostomy (70.9%) that is comparable with survival of patients without mechanical ventilation (79.7%) and slightly higher than in patients on ventilation without tracheostomy (65.4%). No complications during the procedure were noted. CONCLUSION: Endoscopy-assisted dilatational tracheostomy is preferred for prolonged mechanical ventilation, including patients with COVID-19. The undeniable advantages of this operation are fewer intraoperative complications due to endoscopic control, and lower risk of tracheal strictures.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Dilatation/methods , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Endoscopy/methods , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Tracheostomy/instrumentation , Tracheostomy/methods , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Dilatation/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , SARS-CoV-2 , Tracheostomy/adverse effects
14.
Am J Otolaryngol ; 42(2): 102779, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-885171

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Upper airway stenosis is one of the most formidable situations in medicine and is frequently encountered in the ENT clinic. We introduce here our method of emergency endonasal endotracheal intubation under videoendoscopic observation. METHODS: Transnasal endoscopic observation was done, and the region of airway stenosis was detected. Then, the endotracheal tube was prepared and the endoscope was inserted into the tube. The endoscope with tube was inserted up to the larynx. Immediately after the administration of lidocaine to the larynx, the endoscope with tube was inserted to the endolarynx and then to the trachea. The endotracheal tube was tightly held in the nostril, and the endoscope was removed. RESULTS: We have encountered four cases this year. The primary disease developing airway stenosis was acute epiglottitis due to pharyngeal and deep neck abscesses in three cases and laryngeal edema due to Ludwig's angina. All patients underwent uneventful intubation, and dyspnea was immediately ceased. CONCLUSION: In cases showing severe suffocation, the clinician should perform airway maintenance even in an outpatient setting apart from a more monitored setting like the operation room. This technique resembles the usual nasal endoscopic laryngeal observation and is done even in the usual ENT office and/or emergency room. The supine position tends to worsen airway stenosis in patients with upper airway stenosis; however, this technique can be performed in a sitting or semi-sitting position. This method is less invasive for patients and also reduces the risk to the medical staff, especially in this COVID-19 era.


Subject(s)
Dyspnea/therapy , Endoscopy/methods , Intubation, Intratracheal/methods , Laryngostenosis/therapy , Tracheal Stenosis/therapy , Video Recording , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Dyspnea/etiology , Epiglottitis/complications , Female , Humans , Laryngeal Edema/complications , Laryngostenosis/etiology , Male , Tracheal Stenosis/etiology
15.
Laryngoscope ; 131(5): 956-960, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-871404

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The presence of high SARS-Cov-2 viral loads in the upper airway, including the potential for aerosolized transmission of viral particles, has generated significant concern amongst otolaryngologists worldwide, particularly those performing endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). We evaluated a simple negative-pressure mask technique to reduce viral exposure. METHODS: Two models simulating respiratory droplets >5-10 µm and fine respiratory nuclei <5 µm using fluorescein dye and wood smoke, respectively, were utilized in a fixed cadaveric study in a controlled environment. Using ultraviolet light, fluorescein droplet spread was assessed during simulated ESS with powered microdebrider and powered drilling. Wood smoke ejection was used to evaluate fine particulate escape from a negative-pressure mask using digital subtraction image processing. RESULTS: The use of a negative-pressure mask technique resulted in 98% reduction in the fine particulate aerosol simulation and eliminated larger respiratory droplet spread during simulated ESS, including during external drill activation. CONCLUSIONS: As global ear, nose & throat (ENT) services resume routine elective operating, we demonstrate the potential use of a simple negative-pressure mask technique to reduce the risk of viral exposure for the operator and theatre staff during ESS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5 Laryngoscope, 131:956-960, 2021.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/transmission , Disease Transmission, Infectious/prevention & control , Equipment Design/instrumentation , Paranasal Sinus Diseases/surgery , Aerosols/adverse effects , Air Pressure , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/virology , Cadaver , Endoscopy/methods , Humans , Infection Control/methods , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/prevention & control , Masks/virology , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Simulation Training/methods , Virion
16.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 32(10): 1301-1304, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-709228

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: SARS-CoV-2 outbreak is spreading worldwide. As a consequence of the new circumstances, almost all endoscopic units underwent in-depth reorganization involving patients' selection. We analyzed the efficacy of the newly adopted endoscopic triage. METHODS: In March 2020, we monitored endoscopies to evaluate the effects of the novel selective triage aimed to reduce the number of investigations and viral spread/contagions. Clinical-demographic data of the patients, indications, type of endoscopy, endoscopic findings (subtyped in major and minor), finding rates (major and minor) and diagnostic yields (major findings) have been analyzed and compared to the endoscopic procedures performed in March 2019. Furthermore, patients were called at least 21 days after the endoscopy to evaluate the possibility of a Covid-19 onset. RESULTS: Accordingly to the novel triage, the number of procedures dropped from 530 to 91 (-84%). The finding rates and diagnostic yields were 83% (74-89) vs 71% (66-73) (P 0.015) and 56% (46-65) vs 43% (38-47) (P 0.03) on March 2020 and March 2019, respectively. A significant increase of operative procedures has been reported in 2020, 34% vs 22% in March 2019. All the patients were recalled and neither cases of onset of Covid-19 like symptoms nor positive nasopharyngeal swabs PCR have been evidenced. CONCLUSION: The novel endoscopic triage significantly reduced the number of procedures and increased finding rates and diagnostic yields. However, a careful schedule of canceled procedures should be applied to avoid to miss relevant pathologies. No Covid-19 onset or infection has been noted after endoscopies.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Disease Transmission, Infectious/prevention & control , Emergencies , Endoscopy/methods , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Triage/methods , COVID-19 , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2
18.
J Endocrinol Invest ; 44(3): 635-636, 2021 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-639909

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: During the Covid-19 pandemic every hospital has had to change its internal organization. Different institutions have highlighted the risks connected with endoscopic endonasal surgery. The goal of this paper is to illustrate the feasibility of pituitary region surgery during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. METHODS: After two negative Covid tests were obtained, three patients with macro GH-secreting tumors, and two patients with micro ACTH-secreting tumors resistant to medical treatment underwent surgery during the pandemic. During the surgery, every patient was treated as if they were positive. RESULTS: Neither operator, nor patient have developed Covid symptoms. The two neurosurgeons performing the operations underwent two Covid swab, which resulted negative. CONCLUSIONS: Pituitary surgery is a high risk non-urgent surgery. However, the method described has so far been effective and is safe for both patients and healthcare providers.


Subject(s)
ACTH-Secreting Pituitary Adenoma/surgery , Adenoma/surgery , COVID-19 , Growth Hormone-Secreting Pituitary Adenoma/surgery , Infection Control , Neurosurgical Procedures/methods , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Testing/standards , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Endoscopy/methods , Endoscopy/standards , Feasibility Studies , Humans , Infection Control/instrumentation , Infection Control/methods , Infection Control/standards , Italy/epidemiology , Neurosurgical Procedures/standards , Nose/surgery , Pandemics , Patient Safety/standards , Patient Selection , Protective Clothing , Protective Devices , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2/physiology
19.
Int J Surg ; 80: 21-25, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-638076

ABSTRACT

The current dreadful pandemic of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is playing havoc with humanity, socio-communal systems and economic reserves worldwide. Certain countries have managed to curtail COVID-19 crisis to some extent, however, a great majority still remains helpless in containing this outbreak. Rapidly evolving disease patterns and complex epidemiology of the COVID-19 necessitate a tailored approach by medical experts in dealing with this devastating outbreak. Similar to other medical disciplines, surgical associations and societies have developed a tailored approach of patients' selection and management plans with improvised endolaparoscopic practice during the COVID-19 pandemic. Non-essential and non-urgent surgical procedures are deferred till this outbreak is abated. Benefits of delaying elective and non-urgent surgery outweighs the risk of performing surgical procedures on patients with asymptomatic or active COVID-19 disease. Laparoendoscopic procedures increase the risk of aerosol exposure, disease transmission and contamination. Limiting the number of operating room personnel, use of disposable instruments, small trocar incisions, negative pressure environment, and setting energy devices at low modes can help reduce disease transmission during laparoendocsopic procedures. This write up sheds lights on the impact of the COVID-19, big data analytics of response of medical personnel in understanding and curtailing the disease process and the consensus guidelines for carrying out laparoscoendoscopic procedures.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Disposable Equipment , Endoscopy/methods , Health Care Rationing , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/prevention & control , Laparoscopy/methods , Neoplasms/surgery , Pandemics/prevention & control , Patient Selection , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Betacoronavirus , Big Data , COVID-19 , Clinical Protocols , Coronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/transmission , Data Science , Elective Surgical Procedures/methods , Electrocoagulation/methods , Equipment Contamination/prevention & control , Health Personnel , Humans , Operating Rooms , Personal Protective Equipment , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/transmission , SARS-CoV-2 , Ultrasonic Surgical Procedures/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL